Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Washington, D.C. Partner Joe Meadows and Law Clerk Quyen Dang analyze artificial intelligence speech and the First Amendment in "High Court Social Media Speech Ruling Could Implicate AI," published by Law360 on March 6, 2024.
In the context of pending U.S. Supreme Court cases Moody v. NetChoice LLC and NetChoice LLC v. Paxton, the authors discuss issues that could be decided and how that might impact AI speech. The article examines the First Amendment and editorial discretion, referencing landmark cases and raising intriguing questions about the future legal implications of AI rights.
Meadows is an experienced trial attorney, focusing on business disputes, internet defamation, and cyber-attack/privacy matters. He has tried cases before judges and juries, arbitrated commercial disputes, and argued trial and appellate matters in federal and state courts. He networks with digital forensics investigators and public relations crisis experts. He presents CLE programs on defamation and has been featured as a defamation litigator in articles and on radio shows.
Dang is a Law Clerk at GRSM in the Commercial Litigation and Employment Law practice groups. He serves as the Articles & Research Editor for the Journal of Law, Economics & Policy.
To read the full article on the GRSM website, click here.
To access the article via Law360, please click here, Subscription may be required.
To learn more about the GRSM Artificial Intelligence Practice Group, click here.